Learn · Articles
One operation, three businesses, part 1/4: the principle
Ask a BSF operator what business they're in and the answer is usually "black soldier fly". That's a biology answer, not a business answer.
01 · The framing
One operation, three businesses
In a customer strategy discussion recently, the framing that finally made the numbers click was this: a BSF production operation is three separate businesses.
- 1. Bioconversion service. Biowaste comes in at a gate fee. Neonates come in as a purchased input. Live larvae and unprocessed frass go out. That's it. It has pre-processing tuned to the waste stream and rearing modules. No breeding, no post-processing.
- 2. Protein feed and fertilizer production. It buys the live larvae and the raw frass, and turns them into whatever products the input quality supports — feed, fertilizer, whatever local buyers actually pay for. Its equipment is all post-processing, and its job is selling.
- 3. Breeding. It buys live larvae, raises them to pupae and flies, and sells neonates — to the bioconversion business and to others.
02 · The rule
Trade as if they were strangers
Three businesses. Different customers, different costs, different risks. And here is the rule that makes the structure work: they trade with each other at prices as if they were strangers.
The bioconversion business must survive on its gate fee plus what a buyer would honestly pay for larvae and frass. The product business must profit while paying a real price for its input. Breeding must live against the open starter-stock market. None of them survives by hiding its losses in a neighbour's margin.
Does this mean you need three legal entities? No. You need three honest P&Ls.
03 · Why split it
Blended numbers hide the truth
Why bother? Because run as one blended operation, the numbers stop telling you anything. A loss in breeding hides in the gate fee. A post-processing money pit hides in "product revenue". KPIs blur, CAPEX and OPEX cannot be judged separately, and every investor conversation starts from a number nobody can defend.
Split it, and each business gets KPIs that mean something. Each can serve internal and external customers. Each can be judged on its own — and each must clear its own bar even when all three trade only with each other.
04 · What comes next
The same three businesses in every route
A while back I wrote about the three routes a BSF business can take: waste utility, low-cost feed producer, self-built value chain. Whichever route you pick, inside it you are still running these three businesses. That part never changes.
Over the next three posts I'll take each business in turn: what to measure, what to cost, and where each can go wrong — starting with the engine, the bioconversion service.
Which of your three is quietly paying for the other two?
Keep exploring
Related topics and pages
- BSF business course — the course that owns the business-route comparison
- Three routes to a BSF business — the earlier post on the three routes these businesses run inside
- Articles library — the library this post joins
Read next
- Three routes to a BSF business — the three routes a case can follow, and the one it is actually running
- BSF is a waste business — the waste-business framing behind the bioconversion service
- A BSF project should earn its next phase — the phased roadmap that follows a route from validation to full operation
- Three businesses, part 2/4: the bioconversion service — the engine business in detail: what it owns, what it must get right and where it is judged
Next step
Name the three businesses in your operation
Manna can map a BSF operation into its bioconversion, product and breeding businesses and test each one's own numbers.