Learn · Articles

Product value needs evidence

A lower waste-treatment bill is a saving. Larvae sales are revenue for whoever sells them.

01 · The claim

A facility does not give both

A proposed black soldier fly (BSF) facility does not automatically give the biowaste producer both.

02 · The current route

Cost the route you have

Start with what the current route costs and provides. Compare the full cost of an alternative, including collection, preprocessing, operation, financing and the material still needing treatment.

03 · The product value

Test the output and the buyer

Then test the product value. Who can lawfully buy the output, in what form, at what quantity and net price? What does it cost to finish and deliver it?

04 · Both sides

Costs and sales together

For a BSF option, Manna tests both sides together. Credible output sales may reduce the treatment fee a facility needs. They are not automatically extra income for the biowaste producer.

05 · The downside test

Set unsupported revenue to zero

In a downside stress test, set unsupported product revenue to zero. Keep the costs of handling unsold material. This is a test of the case's dependence on sales, not a forecast that nothing will sell.

06 · The result

Which evidence is firmer?

The result may justify a closer evaluation. It may also show that improving the current route is the better next step.

Which part of your case has firmer evidence today: the handling cost, or the future buyer?

Keep exploring

Related topics and pages

Read next

Next step

Test both sides of the case

Both sides of your case, tested together.